Let me start by saying I have no love of David Wright. Too many times he has put me in Home Run Derby Hell, especially with 1 Home Run in his first 100 at bats this season and 3 in his first 150. Yes, I know that he had a great year when it was all said and done (.325 BA, .546 SLG, 30 HR, 107 RBI).
Good for him.
But as I said back on May 10th, he is dead to me, and in Greektown those designations are permanent.
Why do I bring this up? Well yesterday, Richie had a post on why Matt Holliday was going to win the MVP, which of course (in true Richie fashion) he got wrong. In the comment thread, a commenter named “Sky” said the following:
“You know who got screwed? David Wright. And Albert Pujols. Chipper Jones, and Chase Utley, too. Those four were clearly the four most productive players in the NL. All were huge on offense and added a lot of value defensively. If you want to include some sort of voodoo for playing on a playoff team, fine. But that doesn’t mean Holliday or Rollins were better players.”
Sky was kind enough to include a link to his blog, Skyking162, which has a great tag line, “baseball with a hint of lime.” His latest post, and the basis for his comment, uses the statistical measure, total runs above replacement value (TVAR) to determine who was most deserving of the MVP award (David Wright in this case) in the National League.
For those readers unfamiliar with the concept of replacement value in baseball, it tries to measure the production of a certain player, both offensively and defensively, when compared against the strawman “replacement player”, or average player. It comes from the sabermetric world, where the likes of Bill James, Rob Neyer, the Baseball Prospectus and many others who have made a significant contribution the game live.
(more…)